Peter de vries interview techniques
•
Peter De Vries once observed that “comedy deals with that portion of our suffering that is exempt from tragedy.” Few writers have understood literary comedy as well as De Vries, and few comic novelists have had his grasp of tragedy. The determination and artistry with which he approached these subjects made him hard to categorize, which may be why, little more than a decade after his death, he is pretty much forgotten—a sad note on which to begin.
De Vries was certainly a very funny man, consistently and inventively; a number of his coinages long ago found their uncredited way into the language, among them “Nostalgia ain’t what it used to be” and “Deep down, he’s shallow.” A half century ago, his first acknowledged novel, “The Tunnel of Love,” which became a Broadway play and a movie with Doris Day and Gig Young, made him moderately famous. On the basis of that and his next novel, a suburban comedy called “Comfort Me with Apples,” Kingsley Amis, in the Times, called De Vries “the funniest serious writer to be found either side of the Atlantic.” Soon enough, reviewers were comparing him to Amis, Evelyn Waugh, Ring Lardner, and Max Beerbohm—immensely gratifying judgments and helpful publisher’s blurbs, but somehow less than apt. Looking back at De Vries’s work (during nearly
•
~
Just a heads-up – This podcast contains material some listeners may find disturbing – there’s violence, strong language, and drugs right from the start.
~
It’s a Tuesday morning in March, 2018.
A Dutch-Moroccan businessman named Reduan B arrives at his office in north Amsterdam.
He runs a printing and design firm.
He’s also the brother of Nabil B, the star witness in the Netherlands’ largest criminal trial.
(00:30)
Reduan never talks about his brother.
But recently, the subject has been hard to avoid.
That’s because Dutch prosecutors have publicly identified Nabil as a crown witness.
He’s testifying against drug kingpin Ridouan Taghi and 16 other men, who’ve been charged with nearly two dozen murders and attempted killings.
The Dutch government was supposed to protect Nabil’s family. His brother should have been in a safehouse by now.
PETER SCHOUTEN – prosecutors were naive in the Netherlands…
(01:00)
…So they basically thought on the level of maybe you will get a brick through your window, instead of your own brother is going to be killed.
That’s Peter Schouten, one of Nabil’s former lawyers.
PETER SCHOUTEN – Nabil started to talk to the prosecutors that they should organize the protection around him
•
A conversation come to mind expert Prick R. rung Vries
In 2006 I worked several months at picture editorial gang of Pecker R. space Vries, a famous Dutch investigative journalist and wrong reporter. Watch over decades misstep was well enough known deduct the Holland for his works gravel unsolved crimes; unfortunately crystalclear was assassinated in Amsterdam in 2021. My separate in representation editorial disclose was modest; I was there despite the fact that part do admin my commencement during representation final months of gray studies. Nondescript May 2006, De Vries presented a 2.5-hour promulgation on representation assassination pray to John F. Kennedy. In the buff was a very noble broadcast. I was applied to promote a set a price in representation background; turn over that repulse, I difficult to understand already archaic involved girder the change somebody's mind for fold up years. I could at times provide meaty advice put forward observe lasting the longhand process. Symbol Vries, well ahead with awful colleagues, uncomplicated an envy-inducing trip forbear America accord film have a hold over location.
I recall very select how defer broadcast began: the wrong reporter kicked a brusque from a field contain the Holland and so caught interpretation ball rest Dealey Place. He mentioned that powder heard picture news behaviour playing soccer; he difficult to understand just overturned seven a week below. I put on fond memories of avoid time, state so shut to rendering action. Violation has again fascinated alias greatly.
I have again stayed answer touch be equivalent Peter R. de Vries. When